FloLogIQ is developing software to help gas producers decide which wells to operate, how to use available plants and pipelines, and where to sell production. It brings these choices together so teams can evaluate the economic result across the connected system.
Each morning, conditions shift somewhere in the network. When one thing changes, the right answer for every well, plant, pipeline and market can change with it — and the team has to reconsider the whole plan, not one piece of it.
A higher price only helps if the route to that market has capacity and the tariff doesn't erase the difference.
Production that relied on that plant must be reconsidered — or displaced — elsewhere in the network.
Workovers and outages change which combination of wells makes the best use of the capacity that remains.
Restrictions and delivery obligations limit where gas can go, and at what transportation cost.
Processing, tariffs, condensate handling and water disposal vary by well, plant and route.
Maximizing production volume is not necessarily the same as maximizing economic return. A well that looks attractive on its own may consume plant or pipeline capacity that could earn more elsewhere. The comparison has to be made across the connected system.
Illustrative example — not customer dataWells, plants, pipelines and markets can't be optimized as separate problems. Select a plant to see what it connects to — and what a change there would touch.
Evaluate well operation, plant loading, permitted routes and sales allocation together — not one at a time.
Initially uses the operating limits you supply for plants, pipelines and wells.
The operating team reviews the recommendation, applies restrictions or overrides where supported, and records the decision.
Human reviewed.
Operator controlled.
In this example, one plant is running at reduced capacity. The proposed plan shuts in two wells, brings one online and reroutes sales — trading 6 MMcf/d of volume for a higher modelled economic return.
FloLogIQ follows each plan from sales revenue through royalties, processing, tariffs, liquids and water handling, and the expected consequences of shutting in operating wells — so the comparison reflects what the network actually earns.
One number to compare plans — daily economic return — with the categories that explain it.
Each category traces back to specific wells, plants, routes and markets, and the limits that applied.
Net value by market after transportation cost, with delivery commitments held as constraints.
Choose well states, plant loading, permitted routes and market allocation together to improve the modelled daily economic return — within the operating limits the customer supplies.
Check proposed plans against network pressures and flows, rather than relying only on supplied limits.
Include compression effects and costs in plan economics as part of hydraulic integration.
Optional forward-looking inputs for planning beyond today's conditions.
Development-direction capabilities are not yet deployed or validated. They are shown to describe where the product is heading.
FloLogIQ recommends. People decide. The operating team reviews each plan, applies restrictions or overrides where supported, and approves what runs. Every decision is recorded with its inputs and reasons.
FloLogIQ does not control wells, valves or field equipment.
FloLogIQ is being built for the daily planning decisions that production, facilities and commercial teams make together — starting with unconventional natural gas producers.
[Approved biography to be inserted.] Source material describes approximately 20 years of oil-and-gas experience.
Draft · biography and credentials to be confirmed before publicationStart with a conversation about your network and the decisions your team wants to improve. We'll agree on what a pilot should look at before any operating data is shared.
Please don't send detailed operating data through this website. We'll agree on an appropriate process during the discussion.